Linguistic Science and Psycholinguistics
PRINCIPLE | Key Concept
Learners acquire language most effectively when they receive rich, meaningful input they can mostly understand (70-90%), with just enough new structure to stretch their current system.
This isn’t rote exposure — it’s input processed for meaning, where grammar is picked up implicitly through repeated, meaningful encounters.
SIGNIFICANCE | Why this matters for students
Grammar is often acquired through usage patterns, not rules first
Understanding messages primes implicit learning mechanisms
Overly difficult input stops processing; overly easy input stalls growth
PRACTICAL IMPLICATION | How to implement this
Story-based, content-rich listening/reading
Narrow reading/listening on one topic to recycle structures
Focus on meaning first, lightly highlighting forms afterward
These works investigates the concept of language processing and growth. These works also look specifically at how second-language learning.
Krashen, S. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications.
VanPatten, B. (1996). Input Processing and Grammar Instruction in Second Language Acquisition.
Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition.
The following sources support the long-established tradition of repetition, and also support reinforced chunking or thematic learning (i.e. crime as a thematic topic, to support formation of association-networkws).
Bybee, J. (2006). From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language.
Ellis, N. C. (2006). Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics.
Nation, I. S. P. (2013). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language (frequency & spaced encounters).
PRINCIPLE | Key Concept
Languages are learned as probabilistic patterns through repeated exposure to words, constructions, and collocations. High-frequency items stabilize first; durable learning comes from distributed exposure and retrieval across contexts, not massed drilling.
This aligns closely with cognitive findings on spacing and retrieval, but comes from linguistic models of how form-meaning pairings become entrenched.
SIGNIFICANCE | Why this matters for students
Words + grammar are stored as chunks and patterns. Encourage these patterns through themes.
Spaced repetition across contexts builds fluency and automaticity
Practicing recall (not just re-reading) strengthens representation
PRACTICAL IMPLICATION | How to implement this
Learn and practice formulaic sequences (“on the other hand,” “I’d like to…”)
Recycle target forms across varied communicative contexts
Use spaced review + active recall (retelling, paraphrasing, output tasks)
PRINCIPLE | Key Concept
While input is essential, interaction and output (speaking/writing to communicate) play a unique role. When learners must express meaning, negotiate misunderstandings, and reformulate, they are pushed to notice gaps in their language system — which strengthens learning. This is known as:
the Interaction Hypothesis (benefits of negotiation of meaning), and
the Output Hypothesis (output promotes hypothesis-testing and restructuring).
SIGNIFICANCE | Why this matters for students
Conversation draws attention to precise forms
Feedback during interaction (recasts, clarification requests) supports uptake
Output promotes integration of grammar + meaning + pragmatics
PRACTICAL IMPLICATION | How to implement this
Collaborative tasks (information-gap, problem-solving, role-play)
Speaking/writing with feedback or reformulation
Retelling, paraphrasing, or explaining to others
These works investigates the concept of language processing and growth. These works also look specifically at how second-language learning.
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition.
Swain, M. (1985/2005). The Output Hypothesis: Theory and research.
Gass, S., & Mackey, A. (2007). Input, Interaction, and Output in Second Language Acquisition.
Sources
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia Learning (2nd ed.).
Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2015). Learning as a Generative Activity.
PRINCIPLE | Key Concept
Memories strengthen when information is encoded through multiple systems (visual, auditory, motor, semantic).
Combining modalities creates more retrieval “hooks” for the same concept.
SIGNIFICANCE | Why this matters for students
Multichannel encoding improves recall and transfer to real communication.
Reduces dependence on rote memorization or isolated word lists.
PRACTICAL IMPLICATION | How to implement this
Pair new words with images, gestures, actions, or situational context.
Use colors only when they mark meaningful structure (e.g., gender, endings).
Prefer handwriting notes when learning forms or vocabulary— Writing by hand strengthens encoding (motor + semantic + orthographic)
PRINCIPLE | Key Concept
Meaning is partly represented through sensorimotor simulations in the brain.
Understanding words often involves simulating actions or sensations.
SIGNIFICANCE | Why this matters for students
Physical engagement deepens comprehension and memory of verbs and actions.
Supports more intuitive, experience-based learning.
PRACTICAL IMPLICATION | How to implement this
Use gestures or enact verbs (TPR-style) while learning.
Practice language during real activities (cook, walk, describe actions).
Replace abstract drills with role-play and situational enactment.
Sources
Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59.
Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
Asher, J. (1969). The Total Physical Response approach. The Modern Language Journal.
Sources
Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2008). The critical importance of retrieval. Science.
Roediger, H. L., & Butler, A. C. (2011). Retrieval practice in learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
MacLeod, C. M. et al. (2010). The production effect. Psychological Science.
PRINCIPLE | Key Concept
Producing language (speaking, recalling, writing) strengthens memory more than rereading.
Retrieval builds durable knowledge traces.
SIGNIFICANCE | Why this matters for students
Active recall accelerates fluency and prevents illusion of learning.
Promotes faster transition from recognition → usable language.
PRACTICAL IMPLICATION | How to implement this
Say new words aloud and explain concepts in your own words.
Turn notes into self-quizzes (recall → check → correct).
Teach or summarize ideas in L2 to yourself or a partner.
PRINCIPLE | Key Concept
Learning improves when practice is spaced over time and mixed across contexts.
Variability prevents context-bound memory.
SIGNIFICANCE | Why this matters for students
Enhances long-term retention and adaptability in real conversation.
Reduces forgetting curves compared to cramming.
PRACTICAL IMPLICATION | How to implement this
Review across days and weeks, not in one sitting.
Use target words in different sentences, situations, and speakers.
Rotate topics rather than practicing one block repeatedly.
Sources
Cepeda, N. J. et al. (2006). Distributed practice and long-term retention. Psychological Science.
Bahrick, H. P. (1979). Maintenance of knowledge with spaced review. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency, form, and function in language acquisition. Applied Linguistics.
Sources
Kensinger, E. A. (2009). Remembering emotional experiences. Annual Review of Psychology.
Immordino-Yang, M. H., & Damasio, A. (2007). Emotion and learning. Mind, Brain, and Education.
Conway, M. A., & Pleydell-Pearce, C. W. (2000). Autobiographical memory. Psychological Review.
PRINCIPLE | Key Concept
Memories linked to emotion, goals, and identity are more persistent.
Personal relevance increases depth of processing.
SIGNIFICANCE | Why this matters for students
Emotionally meaningful content sticks better than neutral textbook material.
Encourages authentic engagement with the language.
PRACTICAL IMPLICATION | How to implement this
Connect new language to your own stories, values, and relationships.
Journal about real experiences in L2 instead of generic prompts.
PRINCIPLE | Key Concept
Environmental cues (place, state, aroma) can aid recall when context matches.
Effects are limited when contexts change.
SIGNIFICANCE | Why this matters for students
Language is used across many situations, so fixed cues rarely transfer.
Stronger strategies involve meaning, motor action, and semantics.
PRACTICAL IMPLICATION | How to implement this
Don’t rely on aromas, colors, or static study environments as primary tools.
Use contextual cues only as secondary supports, not core learning methods.
Sources
Godden, D. R., & Baddeley, A. D. (1975). Context-dependent memory on land and underwater. British Journal of Psychology.
Smith, S. M., & Vela, E. (2001). Environmental context-dependent memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
Bjork, R. A., & Richardson-Klavehn, A. (1989). Memory theory and context. Psychology of Learning and Motivation.
Sources
Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: The phonological loop. Annual Review of Psychology.
Ellis, N. C. (2002). Phonological working memory and vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition.
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second-language speech learning. Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience.
PRINCIPLE | Key Concept
Vocabulary is stabilized through the auditory–motor loop.
Accurate perception and articulation support long-term retention.
SIGNIFICANCE | Why this matters for students
Poor sound mapping weakens vocabulary learning and slows fluency.
Rhythm and prosody shape natural speech production.
PRACTICAL IMPLICATION | How to implement this
Prioritize ear training, pronunciation, and rhythm from the start.
Shadow native speech (listen → speak along → adjust).